A Nightmare on Elm Street (2010) – A Review


This was a remake, of the classic 80s horror film. I’m not generally a fan of remakes. The overwhelming question that I find myself asking whenever watching one, is “Why?” I, honest to God, do not understand why people make them. It’s all be done before, and it invites inevitable comparisons with the original. And I can’t think of any remake that has outmatched the original (if you can, please do let me know via commenting). And given the rush of remakes at the moment, it seems that there’s some sort of originality drought going on, which is just perplexing. With the horror film remakes that have surged recently, particularly the Rob Zombie ones [which a) I initially thought this was one of, and b) were awful and unnecessary], it seems a particularly relevant issue in relation to this.

And so I entered this film with some preconceptions. Fortunately (or unfortunately, I suppose, depending on who you are) I saw this film at a preview screening immediately followed by the original, allowing for an easy comparison. The chief difference that I noticed, was that this new film takes itself terribly seriously. It replaces the self-mocking amusement value of the original, going instead for the seriously frightening atmosphere. And to be honest, I think it was probably a mistake.

Don’t get me wrong, it was jumpy in places, and I did like the ending (actually a good reinterpretation of the end of the original). But the problem it faced was that it was too predictable, and that’s a real downfall for a horror film trying to be scary. It’s not entirely Nightmare‘s fault, but rather something inherent to remakes. With an original film this popular, most people (particularly those who would be drawn by the title) have already seen the original, and know what happens. So unless it kicks the original plot into touch (which this doesn’t; instead clinging to with the same desperate insistence of a Scottish Nationalist to the idea that independence is a good idea), then it’s going to be handicapped on that level.

But moving away from remake bashing, for a moment, I’d like to take a moment to consider this film in its own right. And to be honest, it doesn’t do too well there. It’s main draw is a fantastic performance from Jackie Earle Haley, as the unmanicured villain. He was very good, and actually made one of the more comedic classic horror villains somewhat scary. Then again, that’s probably not a surprise to anyone who saw him in Watchmen.

Another of the acting points I want to comment on, is a young man by the name of Kyle Gallner. Now, I should point out that myself and Ashleigh are divided on this, but I didn’t like him. He was good in Haunting in Connecticut, as a cancer patient haunted by ghosts. He looked mournful, tragic, and genuinely ill. The trouble is that he looks the same even when playing other characters. He constantly looked sickly and like he was about to burst into tears, and the sheer pathos of his facial expression was a distraction for the entire duration of the film. Utterly pathetic might have flown in his first major film, but he’s been doing it for three films now, and it’s really getting old.

So in conclusion, what do I think? I didn’t like it. 80s horror films of the type of Nightmare on Elm Street were tongue in cheek, and it seems to detract when it takes itself too seriously. Aside from a carbon copy of the bath-hand scene, it didn’t use comedy at all, and suffered from typical problems of predictability. If you’re a fan of the original, you might want to give it a go for contrast’s sake, and if you’re the kind of moron who thinks “HORROR!” and laps it up regardless of quality, you’ve probably ignored everything I’ve just said. My advice, to be completely honest, is to buy the DVD of the original instead.

4 comments

    1. I think it’s more of a reboot, as it isn’t a remake of a specific other Star Trek film, but rather a completely original story. I suppose really it’s more of a bizzare reboot/prequel, but I don’t like using the p-word because of it’s unfortunate Star Wars connotations. And Star Trek XI was actually pretty good.

      Like

  1. The Italian Job was pretty good, more a re-invention than a remake.

    Also, I think you are too focused on a specific genre- maybe in horror it’s disappointing as, as you say, the predictability element is spoilt, but in many other genres its refreshing i.e. foreign films remade into Western films, Old fashioned films remade for a younger market i.e. Freaky Friday, Parent Trap etc.

    Also, Spartacus was fabulously remade.

    So…yeah. Too narrow an approach methinks- just the attitude thats gonna cost you the emperor of earth crown.

    Moo.

    Like

    1. Maybe it was a bit narrow, but I’m not sure I entirely agree with you. The Italian Job remake was shit. Very very shit, whether you call it a remake or a re-invention.

      The remakes of foreign films point, I also take issue with. So many foreign films that are remade that are vastly inferior to the originals, and seem completely pointless. To resort back to horror again, the American remakes of “The Ring” films. The Japanese originals were inherently superior, and I don’t think you’d find many people who disagree. And then there are the Scandinavian films like “Let the Right One In” and “Girl with the Dragon Tattoo”, which Hollywood is already remaking despite the fact that they’re ridiculously new. They might be better, but I doubt it, such films almost always lose something in translation. Not to mention, are we (the West) so culturally incapable as to not be able to watch a subtitled foreign film?

      In terms of the childrens’/family films you mentioned, you’re right. Freaky Friday was good as what it was, and I haven’t seen the original. Parent Trap I’ve never seen, but will take your word on it.

      Also, to diversify a bit, I’d mention TV series. The Office and Life On Mars, are the ones which immediately come to mind. The former is bland and unfunny as a remake, and nothing like as good as the original. The latter is just a pile of arse flavoured arse which completely fucked over the amazing ending of the original, in favour of some psuedo-sci-fi bullshit (look it up, the final scene is on youtube somewhere, and I defy you not to agree with me). It takes a brilliant philosophical treatise and completely destroys it.

      As for Spartacus, I’m not sure what you mean. The 1960 Kirk Douglas one? Was that remake? of what?

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s