Why are Southend Tories against saving £825k on waste collection?


rubbish bags
When the news first emerged that Cory Environmental had lost the contract for Southend Borough Council’s waste collection service, I thought it odd that the local Conservatives decided to position it as the lynch-pin of their opposition campaign.

For one thing, they are the party of privatisation. I wouldn’t describe myself as a completely implacable opponent of private sector involvement in public services but…well, let’s say I’m sceptical.

This, though, is surely the model of how it should work? A contract comes up for renewal, and all comers are invited to bid. They are whittled down to the best offers, and then a choice made between them.

So why were the Tories so against Cory losing the contract? And why are they now so against the £800k saving as a result of changing provider?

Partly I’m asking pointed questions here, but I am genuinely confused. The £825k has been described as a “cut” to the waste budget by Cllr James Courtenay and former councillor Tony Cox. Partly this was to call Independent Party Group leader Ron Woodley a hypocrite — with which I have no problem — but one does wonder whether it’s partly to cover their initial recklessness.

This isn’t the first time I’ve seen this from James. Back when St Hilda’s school closed unexpectedly, Cllr Coutenay bizarrely took the opportunity to blame Labour’s Cllr Anne Jones for the ensuing chaos, being the portfolio holder for Children and Learning.

One problem: St Hilda’s was a private school.

I’m trying to decode what the Tories’ objection to the change of contract is. For a while it was claimed that it would result in a fortnightly service. It won’t, so now they are casting around, looking for excuses to object.

The analogy here is with broadband providers. If I am paying £40 a month for my phone, TV and broadband, and I switch providers to one charging me £20 a month, then I haven’t “slashed my telecomunications budget”, have I? I’ve saved £20 a month.

I had wondered if the Tories might want to try and claim credit for the savings — £825k is a lot of money, though dwarfed by the £11m which their party nationally have cut from Southend. Instead they have chosen to latch onto something, anything, to criticise the new administration on.

Southend Conservatives would, apparently, rather take £825,000 from local residents and their public services, than make a the saving by switching waste collection contractors.

Advertisements

6 comments

  1. Matthew, I think you need to have a look at the Twitter exchange that I was having with your group leader Ian Gilbert. It is quite revealing!

    The job of the opposition is to scrutinise the budget proposals. I have not said that I object to making savings but for the purpose of proper scrutiny of the budget you need to detail how you make the savings. When Ian was pressed on this matter he couldn’t/wouldn’t. It was a case of you just have to trust us.

    In the example you gave you demonstrated how you made your saving. At the place scrutiny committee on Monday evening there was another example of the evasiveness by the Administration. A budget saving of 20,000 is proposed by removing litter bins in residential areas. You would naturally assume if you know the amount you are saving then you would know where the litter bins are to be culled. But no. No idea at present.

    To be quite frank, I did not spend four years of my life as the portfolio holder for our street scene ensuring that Southend was a clean and pleasant place to live winning awards for the cleanliness of our streets and public loos for the Administration to undo this in less than a year.

    1. Julian, yes you did as it seems most of the non cabinet members of the Administration have. I can not believe that that gang of 7 on the Cabinet were so stupid to be believe that this was a good idea! It really is unedifying to see the portfolio holder resort to blaming officers for his incompetence.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s