Sore loo-sers?

southend public toilets

Well, everyone else was punning…

So the Southend Tories have done a George W. Bush and declared mission accomplished in their long and bitter war against the closure of toilets. They can now presumably go back to their long and bitter struggle to close Priory House care home.

On a serious note, I was never particularly pleased with the proposal to close public toilets, its presence marring what I think is generally a pretty good budget, Southend’s £11 million Tory cut considered. I spoke out against it in the Labour group meeting, and hoped that it wouldn’t be part of the final passed budget.

Now, of course, we know that it won’t.

The Conservatives are, of course, claiming credit, but I have to say that I think a large share belongs to a Labour voice: Julian Ware-Lane.

Never shy about his achievements, Julian has claimed as much on his own blog, but he has the evidence to back up his opposition. Anyone who knows Julian will testify to how persuasive (That’s one way to put it… -Ed) he is, and I think it would be churlish to deny his role. This is, as Julian says, in large part a victory for himself and Southend Labour party.

Nigel Holdcroft and James Courtenay reckon that they strong contributed, both having touched the subject on their blogs and probably having reached a readership of double figures (Just about… -Ed) in the process.

Roger Hadley, perhaps, has done a little bit more, the former Tory councillor jumping on the campaign to save the toilets like a man standing for election in one of the affected wards. Wait, what? You mean he is? Well, it would surely be the very height of cynicism to ascribe his enthusiasm to that

In the end, what has happened here is that something has been proposed, and been found to be hugely unpopular. You can argue about whether the responsible councillor, Independent Party Group leader Martin Terry ought to have foreseen this (No you can’t! It was obviously a terrible idea from the off! -Ed), but he did at least have the good grace to reconsider. That is something from which the Tories could learn, after they arrogantly refused to listen over library staffing, closing care homes, and the Shoebury flood defences. I’m looking at you, Tony Cox.

U-turns can be damaging, yes, and too many give the impression of a weak administration. But the truth is that for fourteen years the people of Southend had a council administration which considered itself born to rule, and was unwilling to listen to what they thought. The Conservatives were heavily punished for that attitude.

And whatever else you might say about the joint administration, it is at least a breath of fresh air that it is prepared to listen, reconsider, and admit when it was wrong.



  1. Matt, interesting article. Firstly, whilst I accept this is a Labour blog, you are part of the Administration which proposed these closures. To claim a Labour ‘victory’ on this made me spill my lunch on my lap.

    Secondly, lets not forget that Labour when in opposition SUPPORTED the proposals for the seawall and Priory & Delaware House. Even the new Administrations review of the Seawall was the best option available.

    Now, I will be fair, lets see what alternative options come forward for flood defences at Shoebury Common. If they are better than what was proposed then they will get my full support.

    Whilst you may want to use Mandleson and Campbell like spin, lets be clear, Priory House and Delaware House have not been saved from closure – they will be closed in three years!

    Lets not forget, Liam Byrne left a note in 2010 claiming there was no money left. Had Labour in Government not maxed the nations credit card and left the nation on the verge of being like Greece then there would not have been the need for austerity in the public sector.


  2. On the sea wall/flood defences – I think Tony knows exactly where I stand on this.
    Since he brought up the credit card analogy, will he comment on the fact that his government have borrowed more in four years than Labour did in thirteen?


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s